Pace of progress
Your team explains the process and validates. A business specialist prioritizes the matrix and an Abstra builder implements. Weekly validations, flows going live, without waiting on internal upskilling to start.
Your team explains the process and validates. Abstra specialists map, build and put flows into production. Then continuous improvement with a clear priority list, instead of only sustaining what already exists.
Abstra delivers execution capacity: specialists, an AI platform and continuous evolution of processes.
It comes from real proposal conversations: pace of progress, continuous improvement and ROI with AI in production.
Your team explains the process and validates. A business specialist prioritizes the matrix and an Abstra builder implements. Weekly validations, flows going live, without waiting on internal upskilling to start.
Sustainment keeps what is already live. Continuous improvement finds the next automation, reorders priority and evolves the portfolio. It is the difference between “do not break” and “keep gaining time and control”.
AI enters the flow that actually runs: document reading, reconciliation, rules and posting to the ERP. The signal is a process in production and hours freed on the team, not a roadmap slide without go-live.
From mapping to go-live, with delivery cadence and room for what shows up next.
We gather pains, volume and systems. We build the priority matrix with finance, not an endless list with no owner.
Abstra specialists implement on the platform. Your team validates rules and exceptions in short cycles, week by week.
Flow live, connected to ERP, banks and documents, with traceability so the team can operate day to day.
We continue continuous improvement, hand autonomy to builder users on your team, or mix both. The model can change.
Choose based on maturity. Many customers start with specialists building and later enable the internal team.
Specialists own implementation. Your team explains processes and validates. Ideal when there is no internal technical bandwidth or the wishlist is large and urgent.
Best when: you lack people to implement now
Enablement and builder-user seats so finance can develop and adjust automations, with Abstra support.
Best when: someone can already build day to day
Abstra specialists and builder users in parallel: one front speeds delivery, the other absorbs know-how.
Best when: you want speed and autonomy at once
In the commercial proposal these show up as distinct options. Here is what each one delivers.
| What it is | What you get | |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | Map, build and put the first processes into production. | Flows live, team operating and evidence of results. |
| Continuous improvement | Prioritize new opportunities beyond the initial request. | A partner who suggests the next win and evolves the portfolio. |
| Sustainment | Keep what is already in production and adjust when the process changes. | Continuity without regression, with the option of more autonomy later. |
It is the model where Abstra specialists map, build and put finance automations into production with your business team. You explain the process and validate; Abstra implements on the AI platform, without building an internal technical team just for that.
Sustainment keeps and adjusts what is already in production. Continuous improvement includes that and goes further: it finds new opportunities, reorders priority and evolves the automation portfolio. In proposals, they are distinct engagement options.
Not to get started. Specialists implement with the business team; IT joins when access or integration is needed. If you already have technical capacity, the hybrid model or building with your own team are also options.
Yes. That is the hybrid model: Abstra accelerates fronts while builder users on your team learn and build in parallel. Later, many customers reduce dependency on specialists and keep more autonomy.
AI runs inside the production flow: document reading, exception handling, data matching and rule support. Value shows when automation executes in the ERP and banks, not when the conversation stays only in mapping.
You can continue continuous improvement, move to sustainment, enable the team to build on its own, or mix. Changing models as you mature is expected.
In the conversation we align on model, priority and the path to processes in production.
Talk to an expert